Shame On You, PAP!

Update 27 Nov: Police seen again at dormitory after 60 of the 102 strikers did not turn up for work. I do not understand this. How can sending in the police to those who don’t want to work help settle a wage dispute? What is the priority here– to come to an amicable settlement, or to put on a show of force?

RIOT POLICE. Apparently that’s who the authorities called in when 100 SMRT bus drivers refused to report for work.

Come on, what is this? People go on strike and your first response is to surround them with riot police? What crime did they commit? Were they rioting? Did they damage any property? Did they threaten anyone?

All news reports simply point to the drivers refusing to board the buses to bring them from their dormitories to their depots. Yet someone saw it fit to call in MOM, call in the riot police.

For what? To intimidate the drivers?

The message is loud and clear: Don’t anyone ever think of going on strike.

But I think the real message they’ve sent is how scared the PAP is of industrial disputes, how its so-called listed companies which make their own commercial decisions cannot resolve their own commercial problems without running like crybabies to the nanny govt, and how they exploit cheap labour en masse.

Rather than let workers and management settle their own industrial disputes without govt interference, you chose to put on a show of force to intimidate workers.

How can we believe all their tri-partite nonsense when the unions are powerless and the Govt brings its riot police to the table whenever there is any hint of industrial dispute?

Shame on you, PAP!


About politicalwritings

Someone who sees beyond PAP and "opposition" in Singapore politics. To understand more please see the Top 10 link below.
This entry was posted in OTP Series, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Shame On You, PAP!

  1. Padaly says:

    Er… I agree with most of what you said. But we got to get the facts right. The union has got nothing to do with it. Those PRCs are not unionized. Meaning the union is not representing them. No tripartite involved. It’s between those PRCs and management. I do agree that calling the riot police and MOM etc are “over-killed!”

  2. If I’m not wrong, it’s a crime for workers of essential services to hold a strike. Check out Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) Act Part III. I’m no expert though.

  3. Pingback: Shame On You, PAP! | SING A POor REmi jingle |

  4. Stories says:

    That was through strikes that the Lion was born. Once they were in power, they killed off the strikers.

  5. Pingback: An ‘Illegal’ Strike | Political Writings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s