Hating The PAP: Part II

(Continued from Part I)

To those who hate PAP, I say:

A. Recognize that the old man did things in a certain way because he was a certain kind of person– strict disciplinarian, no-nonsense, no compassion, always driven for excellence.

Hence his laws were strict and harsh; he tolerated no dissent; he spoke hard truths, no pleasantries; he stared his opponents down; he believed the interests of the country (as he saw it) came well before the interests of the individuals. He also lived in a world where he felt continually threatened by the surrounding countries.

Hence, the harsh punishments against even petty criminals; the uncompromising stand on the death penalty; the desire to silence critics; the heavy-handed campaigns against drugs, littering and spitting, even against males with long hair; the overwhelming desire to build a strong military; the drive to be self-sufficient in water; the desire to develop the economy using MNC’s and not depend on the Malaysian hinterland, etc.

It was all in his image.

B. Recognize that many things the PAP did were done for our good, at least as far as he thought it.

Hence, the Two-Is-Enough campaign when overpopulation was a concern, followed by the Graduate Mothers Scheme when that was a concern; followed by the Have Three or More If You Can Afford It when that was a concern; followed by SDU/SDS when that was a concern….

Even more than that, he focused his effort on nation-building– patriotic National Day parades; passionate National Day Rally speeches; using soccer and especially the Malaysia Cup to bond the various races and bring the nation together with a common goal and purpose.

Other less popular measures, again supposedly for our own good: heavy censorship, racial quota for HDB estates, bans on firecrackers, bilingual policy, streaming, CPF, curtailment of free speech, etc.

It was all for our own good, as far as he thought it.

C. Recognize that PAP has changed, and that the old man’s time is passing.

PAP has softened in recent years. Things have been ‘liberalised’, to the extent possible while the old man is still alive. We have R21, then R(A) movies now; CPF investment schemes; F1; casinos; less censorship; less use of ISA; Speakers’ Corner; more opposition, etc.

And recognize that things will change completely when the old man is gone. While I cannot predict what will happen after he is gone, I’m confident the repressive laws we have today will be gone.

Things have changed, things are still changing, and things will change more, when he’s gone.

But what’s more important is to realise that, never in modern history has one man so completely imprinted his mark on a society, a country and a generation.

Those who hate the PAP will never be able to see why Singapore is what it is today, who made it so, how it became so. They’ll never be able to see the greatness of the old man’s achievements, nor will they understand the constraints he had to work with.

They only hate the PAP for 101 things: too many foreign workers, high HDB prices, caught-off-guard ministers; restrictions on civil liberties, etc.

They’ll never understand old man’s legacy. And that would be the saddest thing of all.

Advertisements

About politicalwritings

Someone who sees beyond PAP and "opposition" in Singapore politics. To understand more please see the Top 10 link below.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Hating The PAP: Part II

  1. Pingback: Hating The PAP: Part I | Political Writings

  2. Pingback: Daily SG: 19 Apr 2011 « The Singapore Daily

  3. Alan Wong says:

    Does a great man has a licence to kill anyone he himself hated ?

  4. kim says:

    I agree with your ideas abt mm lee!

    It’s just way to disheartening to read the comments on yahoonews abt all the negativity. It could even be a ploy by opposition pple to write all those negative comments to make it seem like everyone hates PAP!

  5. Pingback: Elections | Voyage

  6. dale says:

    I have to agree with you, sir, on your analysis. Looking at the so-called “1st-World” countries going up in flames with their ridiculous government spending and huge budget deficits, I cannot help but feel that Singapore has done far better than them. Let me list some of our achievements:
    1) World’s 6th Best Healthcare System, according to the WHO
    2) PPP adjusted GDP Per Capita that is 3rd highest in the World, according to the IMF **
    3) Ranked 7th in the world and 2nd in Asia for having the most motivated workforce
    4) According to The Economist Quality of Life Index, we are 11th out of 111 countries.

    ** (some may say that this has been distorted by our high income inequality. However, this is patently untrue. When I calculated our PPP adjusted GDP per Capita using only the bottom 60% of Singaporeans (income distribution data from the UN), we are still ahead of nearly all OECD countries, including France, UK, US, Canada. In other words, the average Singaporean is actually rich in comparison to his overseas peers.)

  7. Pingback: Conversation? What Conversation? | Political Writings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s